Freezer island end 01
Cooling demand rose without a matching temperature gain.
Cooling duty
65.8%
Own baseline
43.6%
Estimate
€33/mo
Measured: 2.4σ from its own recent behavior
Wettbergen store
Overview
Status · 29 Jun 2025
The store is stable, but three decisions deserve attention. Start with the highest avoidable impact.
Energy health
Stable
vs own baseline
Electricity
700 kWh
daily average
Cooling
427 kWh
daily average
Freezing
189 kWh
daily average
Active issues
5
10 under review
Prioritized by impact, duration and confidence
Cooling demand rose without a matching temperature gain.
Cooling duty
65.8%
Own baseline
43.6%
Estimate
€33/mo
Measured: 2.4σ from its own recent behavior
Cooling demand rose without a matching temperature gain.
Cooling duty
50.1%
Own baseline
32.9%
Estimate
€35/mo
Measured: 3σ from its own recent behavior
No sustained store-level temperature anomaly in this review window.
Context · not alerts
Why it matters: Store managers should expect Sunday readings to look different and not treat the drop itself as a fault.
Why it matters: An unexplained cooling spike is more likely a real equipment issue than normal weather variation, which is why Kylvakt trusts these anomalies.
Why it matters: Freezer alerts are rarer and should be treated as more significant when they do occur.
Why it matters: A low year-long "data coverage" number reflects startup gaps, not an ongoing quality problem, and should be reported from Feb 20 onward.
Why it matters: Managers should watch for a pattern of small, growing alerts on the same equipment, not just isolated spikes.
These patterns are shown for context. Folding them into the live anomaly score and priority ranking is a scoped next step, so today's alerts stay based on the current temperature-based model.